|
|
|
|
|
New World Order
Author: SmCyber
|
| |
(Added on Jan 29, 2001)
(This month 45782 readers) (Total 97087 readers) |
| |
Stallion Rape machines are used by the NWO to break the women of the oposition party. Based in the notorious Felicity Camp. |
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 16 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 0% |
0% |
13% |
13% |
13% |
13% |
6% |
6% |
6% |
31% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (7/10) |
| Average
Rating: (7/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (10/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (3/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
MasterSFV
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Dec 9, 2014 |
| |
Great story, kinda like the orgsmatron in Barbarella but with more torture. (10/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Shinier
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 11, 2014 |
| |
There were very few spelling or grammatical errors. The story was enthralling, and the verbiage painted quite a graphic image. (8/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
mkemse
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 19, 2004 |
| |
i found it HOT, hope you either add more chapters or write another story similar to this one (10/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
DrPain
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 15, 2002 |
| |
Excellent use of humiliation -- please, bring us more of this fine material. (10/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
luscious
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Dec 19, 2001 |
| |
It's okay; the writing is choppy, at times, and not always smooth. Lots of action...myself, I prefer more human activities and less mechanical ones, but different strokes for different folks, eh? (5/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
kearl54
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Dec 16, 2001 |
| |
Good story. (6/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
napier |
Rating: |
Feb 16, 2001 |
| |
It was a very intense story (9/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
ol |
Rating: |
Feb 6, 2001 |
| |
awesome (10/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
James |
Rating: |
Feb 4, 2001 |
| |
The story had great possibilities. The story line was good. Fewer characters and more concentration on the humiliation and the pain of the victim. Could make it more exciting by using more pain or higher levels of pain. Author has potential. (4/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
atl-ga |
Rating: |
Feb 2, 2001 |
| |
The story was interesting enough to come back to a second time. More action and less description (with fewer characters) would have made it an 8 or 9. (7/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
CaptainBlue |
Rating: |
Feb 1, 2001 |
| |
Absolutly wonderful story, excellent imagination, I guess the other reveiwers are not into this scene? (10/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
sue |
Rating: |
Jan 31, 2001 |
| |
it was the same thing over and over, i got bored (3/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Ducker |
Rating: |
Jan 31, 2001 |
| |
slow moving, dry (3/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
LM |
Rating: |
Jan 30, 2001 |
| |
This story has a rather oppressive tone. It almost seems like the reason the women are there is to use and abuse not to break them. Not a bad story... (5/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
hyphen 666 |
Rating: |
Jan 30, 2001 |
| |
The author has a one track mind, but that one track is pretty good except for the strong hatred of women which he or she exhibits. (6/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
fucker |
Rating: |
Jan 30, 2001 |
| |
This is a very good BDSM story. (4/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
hyphen 666 (Jan 30, 2001)
- How does one reconcile a failing score (4 on a scale of 10) with the words "this was a very good story"? What kind of dumb revue is this?
- Replied by:
hyphen 666 (Jan 30, 2001)
- How does one reconcile a failing score (4 on a scale of 10) with the words "this was a very good story"? What kind of dumb revue is this?
|
|
|
About 